UK
Sword Register
No.94
Type: Wakizashi
Nagasa: 33.1 cm
Moto-haba: 3.1 cm
Saki-haba: 2.9 cm
Sugata: Osoraku-tsukuri wakizashi with characteristically long kissaki, wide
mihaba, shallow tori-zori with iori-mune and relatively thin kasane.
Jihada: Ko-mokume hada with some ji-nie.
Hamon: Pronounced nie-deki gunome midare, the gunome becoming smaller in the
kissaki. The boshi is slightly midare-komi with ko-maru and a long kaeri.
Horimono: On the ura a koshi-hi and on the omote a four character hiragana hori
reading “Osoraku”.
Nakago: Ubu with one mekugi-ana, kuri-jiri
and sujikai yasurime. Inscribed on the omote “NAGASONE OKISATO” and dated on
the ura “ENPO SANNEN NIGATSU JITSU”.

Of course, immediately noticeable is the strange sugata with the very
large kissaki that seems disproportionate to the overall Nagasa, but which also
gives a very sharp impression. In fact, out of the total Nagasa of 33.1 cm. the
kissaki accounts for 22 cm. This sugata is quite rare and was originally
invented in the sue-koto period by Shimada Sukemune, who made it for the Sengoku
general, Katagiri Katsumoto. The sword had an enigmatic horimono comprising of
the characters O-SO-RA-KU (translated as “perhaps”) carved on the blade and
so the sugata became known as Osoraku-tsukuri. The present sword also has this
horimono, beautifully cut in the hiragana script. One wonders whether Sukemune
was inspired by the uncertainty and impermanence of life at this time of
constant warfare, when he carved the original horimono.
This unusual wakizashi bears a
variation of a doubtful Kotetsu mei. Kotetsu is arguably the finest of all
shinto swordsmiths from Edo. The blade is well forged and has an attractive and
tight ko-mokume-hada with some ji-nie. It has the appearance of a large tanto
rather than a wakizashi and only tanto and wakizashi are known to be made in
this sugata .
The hamon displays many quite coarse,
large and dark nie, particularly in the moto-haba area at the start of the
hamon, where the gunome are largest and the long ashi are most visible. The
midare-komi boshi, the tight jihada, low iori-mune and bright appearance of the
jigane, lead me to think that this is later workmanship than that of Okisato
(Kotetsu) and that this is probably reasonably good shinshinto work.
Clive Sinclaire
Bexley
December 2008
NB: I was surprised at the difficulty
that I found in drawing this oshigata. The initial outline took at least 6
attempts and the nakago rubbing on each side is very poor. The hamon within the
kissaki was difficult to see clearly and so to draw. I am also disappointed in
the horimono rubbing and I actually cut myself (only small nicks) three times
whilst making the oshigata! Finally, please excuse the unusual angle of the
drawing, but without a further reduction in size it could not be scanned on my
scanner.